How It Is Given
Getting Started
Most Common
Breast cancer
This is the concern that stops most women, and it deserves the full picture rather than reassurance. Combined estrogen and progestogen therapy is associated with a small increase in breast cancer risk that grows with duration of use. The picture we walk Los Angeles patients through.
What 2002 found
Almost every fear a Los Angeles patient brings to this subject traces back to one trial and the headlines that followed it in 2002. The Women's Health Initiative combined arm was halted early in 2002 after reporting a small increase in breast cancer and cardiovascular events. Prescriptions fell by more than half within a year.
The detail that did not make the coverage was the population. The average participant was 63 years old and more than a decade past menopause, and the medicines studied were oral conjugated equine estrogen with a synthetic progestin.
That is not the woman starting a transdermal estradiol patch at 49 with micronized progesterone. The trial answered a question about a different population taking different drugs, which is why the age-stratified re-analysis matters so much. More on that in safety and risks, heart health after menopause and early and surgical menopause. When a Los Angeles clinician quotes that trial, the question worth asking is which women it enrolled and which drugs they were actually given.
What we know now
The estrogen-only WHI arm, in women post-hysterectomy, did not show an increase and showed slightly lower incidence.
The association with combined therapy grows with years of use, which is why the decision is revisited annually.
Comparable in scale to the increase from a couple of daily units of alcohol or from being significantly overweight.
Mammograms on schedule. Hormone therapy makes keeping to the schedule more important, not less.
Family history
A mother or sister with breast cancer does not close the door on treatment, and it does change what we need from a Los Angeles patient's history. A first-degree relative with breast cancer raises your baseline risk, and that shifts the calculation rather than settling it. Whether it rules treatment out depends on the age at their diagnosis, how many relatives, and any known genetic mutation.
A personal history of hormone-sensitive breast cancer is different and is generally a contraindication to systemic therapy. Low-dose vaginal estrogen is a separate question, often answered differently, and one for your oncology team. Related reading: vaginal estrogen, blood clot and stroke risk and hrt risks and benefits. If you have had hormone-sensitive breast cancer yourself, expect a Los Angeles clinician to send that question back to your oncology team rather than answer it alone.
More on safety
Six concerns, each taken one at a time, with the actual numbers.
Common questions
What the trial found, how big the risk is, and what family history changes.
Patient reviews
I had been waking three or four times a night for two years and had been told it was just stress. The consultation actually went through my cycle history. Six weeks on a patch and I am sleeping through.
What I wanted was someone who would talk about the risks honestly rather than sell me something. They walked through the clot data and why a patch suited me better than tablets.
The brain fog was the part nobody warned me about. Having a clinician tell me it was a recognized symptom and not early dementia was worth the appointment on its own.
It took two dose changes before things settled, which they had told me upfront might happen. The three-month review was booked before I left the first appointment.
From the blog
Next step
Family history, age at any relative's diagnosis and breast density all turn a population statistic into something that applies to you.
Consultations are by appointment. Prescriptions are issued only where clinically appropriate.